|
|
|
|
|
by guitarbill
3462 days ago
|
|
> The devs are somewhat hostile in this case. You keep saying this, but they really aren't. At least as far as I can see from what's public. Communication is difficult, maybe give them the benefit of doubt? (And some peace and quiet) To me, it sounds you're trying to make a huge issue out of this now, in the hopes it'll get things done quicker. Which is a horrible tactic. This isn't even about who's right or wrong. So far, it seems like nobody disagrees with your basic premise, just the timeframe. Just look at your phrasing. "hostile in this case", "sort of hostile is the major concern", "which argument is right", "it's deciding if/who is at fault", "it's a question of ethics in the bigger picture". Until the say "No", this is all just overreacting. |
|
However, the name of the post is "Is personal GitHub information public domain?"
Which prompted a discussion of the topic. This is simply what it is. I appreciate the opinions of others on this matter.
When I say hostile, the dev accused of sending unsolicited emails.
This matter has begun far before today, the initial request to remove the information came in Dec 21st.
It's not like this is the first day that this matter has been an issue.