[ivansavz]

I've used both extensively and I think they're virtually identical. Mercurial is a bit nicer because it's written in Python, but git has github going for it.

In my experience, once you get into more complicated commands like rebase, I had to read a lot of docs to get things to work in both systems, so I'd say hg is easier to get started with but they're on par overall in terms of complexity.

As a sidenote, I think the ability to `rebase -i` work branches and squash, edit, and drop changesets is a very useful feature, and it's made very easy in git. Mercurial can rebase branches, but it really doesn't like it...

[marcinkuzminski]

As for Mercurial, I'd this RhodeCode is the company going for it, since we heavily invest in supporting Mercurial in our product.