Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by williamle8300 3463 days ago
Maybe because RNC emails are mundane and don't have scandalous material?
1 comments

The majority of the Podesta leaks were extremely mundane. This suggests the RNC leaks were held to a different standard.
The majority, yes. However some were "interesting".
Of course the majority were mundane. The majority of Chapo Guzman's private communications would be mundane too. The contents of the DNC emails suggest nothing about the contents of the RNC emails, though I have no doubt that republicans are equally crooked.
And what does the one-sidedness of the attacks and releases suggest?
The one-sidedness of the attacks? From whom? If you're referring to recent CIA claims that the RNC was hacked as well, then my answer is that I don't trust the CIA. It may have happened, but you have no real proof about Russian involvement at all. Unlike other posters in this thread and Clinton herself, I am not keen on starting a physical war with Russia over conjecture about a virtual attack.