[kuzmin]

Even if everybody does not have the same aptitude, that should not mean that the people who might have more difficulty with certain subjects should avoid them.

Sure, it might be more difficult for me to learn to play the piano than for some virtuoso, but my life will still be richer after I learn it, instead of giving up because it is difficult. No?

[SomeStupidPoint]

Only in a vacuum: there might be something besides piano more in line with your aptitudes that, for the same effort, will give you more reward (or the same reward with less effort).

This isnt to say I don't believe we should do things we're bad at -- I think broadening our aptitudes is good for us -- but you do have to consider the opportunity cost of piano versus another option.

[golemotron]

That's the tragedy of 'everyone can do everything' thinking. And it's why growth-mindset has to be tempered with recognition of aptitude. If it isn't it can derail lives.

[npsimons]

> Sure, it might be more difficult for me to learn to play the piano than for some virtuoso, but my life will still be richer after I learn it, instead of giving up because it is difficult. No?

The very process of working to improve at something you're not good at (or have any natural aptitude for) is a wonderful way to learn how to adapt, compensate for weaknesses, and overcome adversity. I know I'll never be a weightlifting champion, but aside from the health benefits, I lift because it's something I'm not good at.

[mitchty]

Exactly, we should encourage attacking adversity. It is the only way to get resiliency.

I've been told in the past I'm good at solving complex problems I've never encountered before. I just show them my notes on how I solved it and say I'm not good at all, just persistent and willing to learn as I go. I notice a lot of people give up at the first sign of adversity. I might too depending on the criticality but that doesn't mean I accept defeat.