|
|
|
|
|
by keefe
3461 days ago
|
|
>This only allows you to strangle yourself in a more CPU-efficient manner. I thought you meant losing cycles due to blocking or spinlocks when you said strangling. >Locks et al. are low level interface Actually no, this is the world of multiple cores. Threads are the most trivially accessible way to parallelize activities, so they are just a modern primitive. >Once you go into clusters, you loose your precious notion of shared memory anyway Zookeeper. Distributed clocks and sequences and all that often require a few bits. I was just making fun in the last sentence, if you didn't catch the linguistic joke about populism in my word choice. I'd guess you work in erlang. |
|