|
|
|
|
|
by niksakl
3473 days ago
|
|
Keep in mind that Egypt is practically under a dictatorship. It is not like their gov really cares if their people gets pissed off... Their government is far from carrying about peoples liberties[1]. So, for me the question remains: If what the Egyptian government wants is to apply their surveillance policies and Signal is banned because it is preventing them, doesn't the continuation of operation of other "private and encrypted" messangers say something? Especially of Whatsapp that claims that it implements the same security and privacy oriented architecture as Signal does? [1] https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2013/egypt |
|
No man rules alone. Even in a dictatorship, pissed off peasants mean an army that has to do horrible things to keep them in line. That costs a dictator money.