Just to clarify: if you rent an apartment that is in an area with high property taxes, you still get to go to the same local school as the people who own their homes.
Yes, but these towns go to great lengths in their zoning codes to exclude affordable apartments. If we could decouple education from locale then maybe there wouldn't be so many municipalities trying to explicitly prevent affordable housing.
And yet those opposed to school choice are the very ones whose contituencies would benefit most. Being against school choice is almost a liberal mantra; likely because the teachers unions are major contributors to Democrat politicians. They also oppose charter schools for the same reason. Look at Elizabeth Warren's flip flop on charter school quotas in Massachusetts; it wasn't an accident hat she received significant campaign donations from teachers unions before she took her 'principled' stand favoring keeping quotas low.
I support free choice in education because it's fair and gives poor students with dedicated parents a chance to get a great education.
I oppose private, for profit charter schools because they are notorious for corruption and poor education in both the college and K-12 sectors.
There are regions where parents can choose the public school their kids attend. My home city does exactly that and is home to some top-notch magnet schools which have graduated several famous individuals.
> I oppose private, for profit charter schools because they are notorious for corruption and poor education in both the college and K-12 sectors.
I've heard the same complaints about corruption in teachers unions and poor education at urban non-charters. Everyone has their own examples for each side of the argument.
I can never tell how much of the pro- or anti- charter allegations are politically motivated or real science.
Best option I have is to rely on actual research. Stanford provides some periodic in depth studies of school performance, and has found that "across 41 regions, urban charter schools on average achieve significantly greater student success in both math and reading."
That's heavily caveated. There are regional variances. Maybe charters don't outpace peers outside of urban environments. Still, it's enough for me not to dismiss them out of hand.
"School choice" is code for rich people sending their kids to private schools and not contribute to the public good, or for businesses trying to squeeze profit out of taxpayer money. I'm sick of that bullshit.
Those apartments are high-rent compared to areas near districts with lesser schools. I guarantee, every realtor factors the local school quality into house valuations.