|
|
|
|
|
by FabHK
3474 days ago
|
|
I enjoy the discussion, and agree that base 10 is suboptimal. Base 8, 12, or 16 would be preferable (8, 16 due to affinity to the binary system; 12 due to the factors). However, we are stuck with 10 for now. (Surely there's an argument against God here.) If we lived in a base 8 or base 12 world, a radically rationalised version of the customary royal measures based on doubling or factors 8 or 12 might be preferable. But we are not. > It is better to have multiple units for multiple purposes. Why? Differences in scale are easily accounted for with the prefixes: mili, micro, nano, pico, femto, atto takes you down to 10^-18; with zepto and yocto you get to 10^-24. kilo, mega, giga, tera, peta, exa takes you up to 10^18; with zetta and yotta you get to get to 10^24. |
|