|
|
|
|
|
|
by TheBiv
3470 days ago
|
|
|
Your response logically follows, however it is my belief that the inconsistency you point out is too nit-picky. What I mean is that HN generally follows the Principle of Charity [1] where we should seek to understand the authors strongest possible conclusion rather than tear down an entire article simple due to a relatively minor inconsistency. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity |
|
|