[rubberstamp]

First quote shows Chumley has no idea of how tech works, the costs involved, and the negligible effect it will have on the problem he is trying to solve.

> “If we could have manufacturers install filters that would be shipped to South Carolina, then anything that children have access on for pornography would be blocked,” Chumley said. “We felt like that would be another way to fight human trafficking.”

What? I guess he thinks child pornography is "porno for children". So he wants manufacturers to install filter that would block children from viewing porn by blocking access. Which by the way does not help prevent human trafficking at all.

[trav4225]

Well, I suspect the general theory is that decreasing revenues to internet porn outfits will put a damper on the entire online porn industry, which will, in some measure, reduce demand in the trafficking industry...