[binarytransform]

Correct me if I'm wrong. Here of all places on the internet, an article with the title of "Ten Years at X" is expected to encapsulate some kind of intellectually rigorous narrative about the passing and the meaning of those 10 years to both the author and the organization. Or are we to assume that such standards no longer exist in order to receive upvotes on HN?

[nicky0]

Clearly, you are wrong. People up-vote articles they find interesting based on the criteria of their own choosing. You can't expect every HN reader to share your own particular standards for what an article "should" be.

[lacampbell]

I see where you are coming from, but I liked it purely for the Malaysian School anecdote.