[kLeeIsDead]

There is no acceptable limit. It should be for life, or longer.

[stolsvik]

Remember that no rule nor policy is for ever; you always have politics. The new party in power might change everything, always.

[agumonkey]

A test is a test is a test.

[kLeeIsDead]

And, in my opinion, the test would be useless if it had a time limit attached to it.

[agumonkey]

I think we could get some insights even with a broken test. But it has to be made by open minded scientists other wise people will interpret it as final truth.

[nercht12]

Problem is that a "good economy" is a subjective idea. It won't matter if open-minded scientists review it 'cause people are going to interpret the results how ever they want anyways. Edit: I'm not really aiming to contradict you. I would like to see it analyzed in an unbiased manner.

[kLeeIsDead]

I think it's completely useless. The only results I care about are in the long term (30+ years). This is essentially a 2 year salary giveaway. Not even close to UBI.

[mjevans]

However this test is not testing the actual idea of UBI.