|
|
|
|
|
|
by timv
3476 days ago
|
|
|
> He hasn't been a working physicist for a long time precisely because of how unnecessarily and uncharacteristically nasty he is. It's hard to understand why New Scientist decided to quote him then. They certainly seem to be presenting him as someone worth paying attention to. |
|
|
Is it harder than to understand that they publish an article with the false title and false interpretations?