|
|
|
|
|
by thentic
5888 days ago
|
|
Given that privacy policies and TOS change on most websites, is there any merit to a 'bait and switch' argument or anything like that? I remember a recent commenter suggesting there was but didn't see any follow up. Conceptually, there is no contract between FB and its users. It's use at your own will; essentially a one-way deal and therefore cannot be a contract. That said, knowing they monetize our content, can argument be made that our content is 'consideration' and therefore a contract is implied? |
|