Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by st3v3r 3475 days ago
They aren't. You'll have to provide evidence for your claim.
1 comments

Let's see some statistical analysis that the fact checkers FB claims are disinterested arbiters of fact aren't in fact pushing an agenda before we go along with censorship maybe.
I'm not willing to call it censorship, and you still haven't provided evidence for your claim that two routinely considered reputable fact checkers aren't.
Can you supply any concrete examples of fact checkers that have undergone such rigorous evaluation?