[SanFranManDan]

Agreed.

In the functional world, there obviously aren't objects and structs are not the same things as objects in the OOP sense.

Even then the key part of a ORM is the "R". ORMs allow you to utilize a RDBMS transparently as if you were manipulating the OOP objects.

A couple of projects that this is closer to than Django ORM.

https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto -> "Database Wrapper" http://www.yesodweb.com/book/persistent -> "data store interface" https://hackage.haskell.org/package/groundhog -> "Database Mapping"

[chisleu]

When your structs can have functions on them that modify the original struct's data, the line between object and "really really object like struct" is very thin.

I appreciate this guy's work, but DSLs make more sense to me than orms in golang.