|
|
|
|
|
by lkowalcz
3477 days ago
|
|
Ah ok, sure. I wouldn't call something like a linear transform on anonymized features "encryption" (more like obfuscation?), but I guess it's good marketing in that it lets them associate with the "recent advances in [real] homomorphic encryption" |
|
Agreed on the clever marketing, but at least they put their money (expensive dataset) where their mouth is (release it to reverse engineers the world over).
Fully Homomorphic Encryption challenges would be interesting, but it would disqualify our current state-of-the-art algorithms, and reduce the playing field to a handful of people who know how to write algo's that work with Fully Homomorphic Encryption (if any competitor at all is allowed to work on this, and not too busy working for the NSA).