[hackuser]

Rarely has Britannica been criticized for having articles that are too short. Certainly we can find plenty of 'stubs' in Wikipedia and plenty of long articles in Britannica.

Is more better? Is more mediocre information better than less? How do you know what you're reading is true?

>> As the public now widely accepts lies and propaganda

> The public has always done this.

It's always been true to a degree, just like there is always crime, but sometimes it's much worse than others. Right now there is plenty of evidence that the situation is bad.