|
|
|
|
|
by kriro
3489 days ago
|
|
The OP describes competition teardown and learning from what they do, essentially reverse engineering their processes and also applying things from other domains to your own domains. I think seeking patent protection for your own processes when you actively recommend tearing down processes of your competition is a bit odd. """borrowing a proven approach from a parallel industry""" I've translated that to copy+improve. I mean what if that approach was patent protected? How would you go about borrowing that proven approach? |
|
That's why he talks about borrowing it from ANOTHER domain, where even if its patented, it doesn't apply to yours.