Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by telesilla 3489 days ago
I agree that mid-lower-range shops are a racket: however, don't discount the luxury and privilege of high-end options of dedicated professionals. My glasses cost in total almost $1000. I wear them almost every waking moment, they are exceptional designer hand-made frames from France with Zeiss lenses and Japanese transition technology, and the optometrist is top-of-the-line who also does an eye cancer check each year. They are a beautiful piece of art that I chose, because I find contact lenses troublesome and I enjoy taking my glasses off to both relax and for the pleasure of having a blurred world around me (other short-sighted users will understand this pleasure). When I was a student, I wore $25 government-sponsored glasses. I'm so pleased there are options for both. I'm so glad there are $1 glasses for those who need them and can avoid overpaying for low quality.
3 comments

At that price, I would consider laser surgery.
I'd be subject to presbyopia, and prefer to wear bifocals.
By the way, "short-sighted" in American English universally means "lacking in imagination or foresight". Not that you're obliged to accommodate American English, of course, but "nearsighted" is the equivalent.
Every eye doctor I've been to in the last decade has done an eye cancer check, I think that's standard.
Right, that's the point: the chain stores don't have doctors, they have people who are trained to use machines and don't check for anything except getting your prescription.