|
|
|
|
|
by ajkjk
3490 days ago
|
|
Quaternions model 3d rotations, and Clifford algebras in general model rotations in arbitrary higher dimensions, but it's definitely non-trivial to go from "complex numbers model 2d" to all of that machinery. What I mean is that the intuition around complex numbers doesn't extend. Certainly not the "i is the square root of -1"-level understanding of complex numbers. Clifford algebras are better thought of as structures built over the higher-dimension vectors spaces, with little relationship to algebras/fields. They have much more in common with the matrix representation than the algebraic one. The algebraic perspective only supports complex, quaternion, and octonion numbers before breaking down. |
|