[eru]

Fair enough. That's interesting.

The article seems more concerned with goals and incentives, than with nuts and bolts.

By the way, how would your Tarot card system work? They could make for an interesting qualitative instead of quantitative system. Say, you try to do an action, draw a card and interpret "The Fool" as fumbling.

[pw0ncakes]

The cards have a ranking that is on the card (Judgment is 21, World is 20, Fool can be 0 or 22) if you need a quantitative result, but it would be a mostly qualitative system. How it would work would be based largely on the GM, since you can't write rule books for qualitative systems.