[coldtea]

>The article blatantly edited out those reasons and rearranged his quotes to give this doctor an anti-psilocybin crusading slant. It worked, you immediately dislike him not knowing what his real concerns are, and were just given an out of context snippet.

Probably. But then again, I cannot imagine what his concerns about marijuana are in general, since we've had studies on marijuana for 50+ years now and there's really no scientific basis for banning it or not using it for "other purposes" (besides medical), any more than there's e.g. for smoking in general.