|
|
|
|
|
by fao_
3486 days ago
|
|
> All they should care about it is "is this illegal?" In many countries, the UK included, many of the posts on the fascist subreddits are illegal. > But why should we not fight for them? Because the value of life should be held to higher value than the 'destruction of free speech' (Except Reddit isn't doing anything to their free speech, they're denying them a platform. Which is objectively different). These people quite literally stand for genocide. > I don't have the right to not be offended Yes, yes you do. That's part of free speech, isn't it? |
|
I'm not condoning threatening behaviour or violence, I'm just saying that I believe that if someone wants to call be a ginger bellend, they should have the right to do that.
Freedom of speech should be defined as such: Free speech and the right to freedom of expression applies to ideas of all kinds including those that may be deeply offensive.
The trick behind it is that your speech here may be offensive to the far-right, does that mean that you would be okay if they passed a law saying it was illegal?