|
|
|
|
|
by xenophon
3494 days ago
|
|
According to Krugman, the paper is "a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in economics." I think this paper is a great example of the playfulness inherent to an effective "hacker" mindset -- do something fun and interesting, and perhaps useful conclusions will follow. Perhaps they won't, but hey, you still had fun. |
|
So, if I understand correctly (as non-native English speaker), the usual in economics is: "ridiculous analysis of serious subject" ??