|
|
|
|
|
by aluhut
3487 days ago
|
|
> I think there's just less disadvantage to admitting you were hacked than there used to be. Is there any data that would support this claim? I just don't believe it. This is the worse version of a technical failure. Admitting a technical failure would therefore be automatically better then a hack. |
|
I really doubt that's the way the general public views this (and they're the ones that matter when it comes to what companies are willing to admit)
If they say they had a technical error the perception would be that it's their fault.
If they say that they've been hacked the perception would be that it's because someone else did something bad, so they're the victims.
I think this is terrible, but I fear that it's the truth