|
|
|
|
|
by graphene
3483 days ago
|
|
They trained on a computer model of the optical circuit, and only did the feed-forward step on the real thing. The rationale for that is that real-life models spend much more time (and energy) in inference mode, so that is the step you'd most want to optimize. I can't help but think it would be really cool to automatically produce a circuit that would output the gradient of the error of the actual NN, so you could optimize that directly. |
|