|
|
|
|
|
by RobIII
3491 days ago
|
|
> None of my tools work with it, and now my browser has to run a bunch of js for something that's normally native and very fast. It's not that I don't agree with the general idea of your post, but I disagree with this part. If nobody every tries something new we'd still be in the stone age. I think base122 is a bit silly but if it had it's use and adoption became widespread then browsers and tooling etc. would follow, just as they now support base64. |
|