|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway729
3497 days ago
|
|
> Wait, does that mean in development? I think xchaotic probably meant "in development of production code", and is wrong for two reasons: 1. Compilers are production code, and the research agenda this post describes informs a lot of that code (by way of language design). Unverified compilers still make a lot of use of underlying theory. 2. Correctness proofs and static analyses, which are both deeply related but different from what's being described in this post, are used in production environments every day. |
|