|
|
|
|
|
by ivansavz
3491 days ago
|
|
> In the meantime, rote memorizing your multiplication tables and polynomial expansions might be a necessary evil... I disagree on both ideological and technical terms. Won't students lose the "flow" as soon as they start memorizing? It seems like an anti-intellectual activity to memorize data or particular steps (e.g. (a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2). I think the further we stay from memorization the better the learner's experience will be. Now for the technical objection. You said some degree of memorization might be a "necessary" evil, but I have a counter example: me. I've been doing math for the past 15+ years, but to this day I never learned the multiplication table. People are often surprised when I need 78 and I have to do 74 and add the result twice. "I thought you were a math person, and you don't know the multiplication table?" some will say... and I'm, like, yeah. |
|
> Won't students lose the "flow" as soon as they start memorizing?
The core of my argument is that memorization will help them better find and stay in the flow in the first place, over the long term.
People wouldn't argue that having to learn your scales, chords, etc. gets in the way of creative piano playing, for instance; how and why is math different?