From the posted article: "This leaves us with 122 legal one-byte UTF-8 characters to use"
Seems legit to me.
> Base-122? Not sure if it's even possible.
Parent is clearly referring to his previous statement, not that Base-122 itself is not possible.
> Base-122? Not sure if it's even possible.
Parent is clearly referring to his previous statement, not that Base-122 itself is not possible.