[phailhaus]

Why is the amount of money spent relevant? At the end of the day, more individuals felt that Clinton should be their president.

[lintiness]

uh, dunno ... maybe yield on dollars spent is indicative of, say, their ability to manage our tax dollars.

[phailhaus]

No? I don't see how spending money on a campaign is related to spending money on, say, social security. Otherwise, you're suggesting that advertising companies would be fantastic at government. Like, "They got me to buy Coke, they must be great at managing our public education!"

[lintiness]

i didn't qualify their "ability" to govern; i suggested a poor use of money spent campaigning MIGHT be indicative of one's poor use of money governing. do you have a logical counter, or are you and everybody else around still crying over the hillary loss?

[phailhaus]

My logical counter was that use of money spent campaigning has almost nothing to do with one's use of money governing. One is related to your ability to motivate a voter base, and the other is about policy-making and apportioning funds for public services. Completely unrelated.