|
|
|
|
|
by Zombieball
3490 days ago
|
|
Don't shoot the messenger! I am just passing along the one story I remembered / found interesting. I'm not saying this scenario is plausible for swaying the outcome of a presidential election (which is what I am sure is on many of your minds right now). But for locally elected officials? Seems at least plausible to me. At the end of the day I imagine electronic voting is all about speed. A quick wiki search brings up the following anecdote: > The voting system has been widely accepted, due in great part to the fact that it speeds up the vote count tremendously. In the 1989 presidential election between Fernando Collor de Mello and Luiz InĂ¡cio Lula da Silva, the vote count required nine days. In the 2002 general election, the count required less than 12 hours. In some smaller towns the election results are known minutes after the closing of the ballots. |
|