|
|
|
|
|
by pastProlog
3494 days ago
|
|
> It seems reasonable to argue that bail-outs for banks amid broad woes for workers led to a loss of confidence in the system. Well that's one thing. We were told abolishing Glass-Steagall needed to be done because it was only something liberals who like big government wanted and was a 66 year old relic of the New Deal. Then the bankers come to the taxpayers 9 years later and demand to be bailed out because they're now "too big to fail" and if they're not handed a fortune of the taxpayers money quickly with little debate, the world economy would collapse. |
|