Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Nadya 3496 days ago
I'll give you a neutral answer for a neutral question.

You must be American-born to be eligible for president. With the exception of the "(truly) first generation Americans" which could be citizens since nobody was yet natural born [0].

This is what the birth certificate controversy/conspiracy [2] was about. Obama's father [1] is Kenyan so there was some belief he was born in Kenya, not a "natural born US citizen" and thus illegible for position as the POTUS.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause

[1] It might be his mother, but I remember it being his father. It's one of the parents, but not both.

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_consp...

1 comments

As a matter of constitutional law, natural-born citizen is kind of undefined. If he had been born outside the US, the would have had dual or even triple citizenship at birth which would seemingly also qualify.
Right...undecided in courts, but my (naive) reading of it would mean that you have to be a citizen from the moment you leave the birth canal. It doesn't seem like it should matter where exactly you were born...if your American parents were vacationing in Bermuda for 1 week when you were born prematurely, that means you can't run for president 35+ years later?
Ted Cruz, a Canadian, was almost nominated as the Replubican candidate. Clearly, a large number of people feel that the definition of natural American citizen is a bit more flexible then that.
That's exactly in line with my statement. His mother was an American - it shouldn't matter where he happened to be born.