| As long as Microsoft isn't addressing the real blocker for people to skip Windows 8 and 10, they won't convince that user base. Those users might eventually move to 10, but will stick with 7 as long as they possibly can and the Windows apps they rely on support. I must say I don't understand the reasoning behind Microsoft not providing a Pro or Enterprise Windows version that doesn't use the existing users as tester for UI experiments or how much sensitive information they're willing to share on a desktop machine intended for very likely private work (authoring text, media, code, etc.). They're making the same mistake as GNOME and KDE are, with trying to shoehorn Tablet feature onto the desktop, while pretending the keyboard and mouse are less relevant now. I admit that there are those who are not power users and run Windows, but those that aren't are most likely better served with a lower maintenance solution like a Tablet with a bluetooth keyboard for writing sessions, and there the privacy invasion is already accepted by using a mobile OS. PC Gamers and creators are the power users who use Windows for various applications, and Microsoft is making life very hard for them by bundling the improvements in the subsystems with the mobile OS experience on top without offering the new kernel features and such with the old user experience and trustworthy environment. If you think about it, using a desktop environment that leaks like that for sensitive works doesn't make sense. Someone writing a book or movie script or working on an unpublished program doesn't want even only metadata about it to leak into cacheandclipboard.mscloud.azure.com. This is all very weird and self-destructive and provides fodder for those who would like to believe Microsoft, Google, Apple are adding these features on request by monitor+control agencies. |