|
|
|
|
|
by js8
3499 days ago
|
|
I guess you're right, it doesn't come so much from lambda calculus as I claimed, it was more inspired by it. Although to be fair, in the time the Lisp appeared, it was the closest thing (by a wide margin) to lambda calculus. I think it was a valiant effort to bridge the gap in that direction (and the design choices were influenced by the trade off that he also wanted a practical programming language). Also, even languages like Haskell are not based only on theoretical lambda calculus, but they also have primitives for data types, which could be, in theory, represented by lambda expressions. |
|