Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ars 3497 days ago
Or, it might be the exact opposite: For a building the engineer and builders are required to take personal responsibility.

Not so for software.

Perhaps if you change that software might change.

1 comments

Nothing would ever get built if individual devs were held liable by the public.

The liability sits with your employer.

Sorta. The basis for your concern underlines one of the problems. When such gaffs happen in engineering, the firm is blamed. Within the firm, individual actors are blamed. In software, on the other hand, your major system might have responsibility for a critical system spread across a total of 1 persons, so he gets all the blame. Is that really okay for one hip-shooter to take this on in the first place?