|
|
|
|
|
|
by grzm
3498 days ago
|
|
|
I've thought about this, too. In particular, I'd like to, say, separately up vote "substantive" and down vote "agree". That said, how complex do we really want the UX to be? As for "didn't read", if you're not interested, just move on. If you think the article is inappropriate and can, flag and move on. If you see a comment that looks like the poster didn't read the article, you can call civilly call out what is in the article, and perhaps down vote the comment. |
|
|
Yeah I thought about this very hard actually, and came to the conclusion that just a "weight"(+) button is enough.
And, if you care that much so that you would waste your time providing more ... contextual meta-info (about the weight itself), you simply need a pop-up and a quick way to select words from a common dictionary. Certain users can even make content "more spammish" by simply increasing the weight with a click (they agree with the labeling and they are "special" in some way).
This, and the weight itself should provide enough info for a comprehensive "decoration" of the postings.