Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by anpk 3495 days ago
Does that mean people can't fast without violating the patent?

How is that going to be enforced especially considering fasting is part of Islam, Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism?

4 comments

Somewhere in my innocent heart flickers the hope that patenting fasting wouldn't be possible even in a parallel universe where it's not part of Islam, Hinduism, Jainism or Buddhism...
...or Judaism and Christianity ?
> Does that mean people can't fast without violating the patent?

From the language, it would suggest that you'd have to administer this as a treatment for diabetes. And it's a very specific form of fasting, not fasting in general.

I really wish more people knew how to read a patent. These knee-jerk (incorrect) reactions only serve to generate hysteria.
If I'm not mistaken, you can make/do a patented thing as an individual all you want, you just can't commercialize it.
That seems very anti-competitive. So basically, if fasting is a free treatment for diabetes, you can't promote it without paying these guys a royalty? Boooooo
You can probably promote it and they won't care. They will care if you run a thing that you charge health insurance companies for.
Right but that's where this gets ridiculous.

Telling a patient to fast is basically a clinical practice. Almost like checking blood pressure. No actual supplies needed, just behavioral counseling.

By the same logic, could I patent checking blood pressure?

Isn't that generally applicable to patents?
You are still infringing, but nobody is going to come after you unless you are doing commercial damage.