[4ad]

I bought an X-T10 a year ago and I don't like it at all. The lenses are excellent, and the build quality of the camera and lenses is impressive, but that's about it. Battery life sucks badly, the very proprietary and esoteric battery sucks when visiting less-developed countries where you can't buy a new battery easily, camera takes too long to boot, autofocus is too slow, fly-by-wire manual focus has an annoying lag, manual focus is awful with electronic viewfinder, jpeg colors are ugly and offensive forcing me to process raw files (I'm perfectly happy with Canon or iPhone jpeg colors for what I do). The lenses are not significantly lighter than DSLR lenses and are just as bulky.

It's too bad because I really wanted to like this camera. As I said, the optical quality is excellent, and the build quality of the metal construction is something you can't find in anything produced this decade apart from Leica.

Since I got my Fuji, I shoot my Nikon FM3a (mechanical film SLR) more. It's lighter and much less bulkier, never runs out of battery, and I am happy with Velvia 50 colors.

I want to sell my Fuji gear.

The X100T has a leaf shutter, and it's much smaller. It's a very nice camera for what it's supposed to do, but I can't justify buying a secondary camera at that price, and for me X100T can't be a primary camera. I need a SLR with interchangeable lenses (or at least a normal 50mm equiv. lens, not the wide lens of the X100T).

[jplahn]

I feel you. I'm not a huge fan of the X-T10 if I'm honest (I think it's a decent camera, but not one I would personally get). Fuji is definitely targeting a certain segment and many people may not care for the features that appeal to that segment.

There's something hard to explain about the top X series cameras. In terms of actual "camera stuff", they're comparable to other cameras in their price range for the most part. But there's something transcendent about the products themselves that makes it hard for me to switch. I'll put it this way: I'll take my X100T with me on any trip, no matter how small since it's such a pleasure to use and handle. I wouldn't do that with virtually any other camera. It's definitely a different strokes type of thing, but it's made it so much easier to photograph everyday life and not feel like I'm slogging around a DSLR.

[stillworks]

The Fuji lineup is a bit of a mixed bag IMHO.

The X-Pro is a bit weird for me to use with zoom lenses. You have to switch to the EVF if using zoom lenses. The larger primes obstruct the OVF ! The X-Pro2 has a control dial layout which can be a bit of an "acquired taste".

I like the X-T lineup. The X-T2 is awesome TBH.

But then none of the lovely primes have optical IS :-/

I consider the X100T, no matter how lovely it is to behold, to be the "thinking photographers' camera". And I don't understand the lens, why is it allowed to focus that close when the image is so soft at closest focus. I had the X100T for a while but didn't go well for me.

Olympus/Panasonic seem to have some very compelling bodies/lenses. With Olympus I could have IBIS and then have access to stabilized primes such as Panasonic Leica 15mm f1.7 and 25mm f1.4.

Currently trying out the X-T10 with 18-55 kit lens and that seems to be coming out good. The lens is stellar between 23mm to 35mm at f/4 and the Classic Chrome film simulation is something I can get behind.

Interesting times these are... choice aplenty we have.

[leephillips]

The X100T is only soft in macro when wide open. Stopped down below 2.8 and it's fine. But wide open it's worse than soft - there is a kind of haze to the image.

[itazula]

There were similar problems when the X-Pro1 first came out, but over time firmware updates (for the camera body AND lenses) improved the shooting experience substantially.