[dominotw]

>that doesn't show dishonesty.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213

Not disclosing the 'veto' in the article is pretty dishonest. don't you think?

Running 20 front page anti-trump articles everyday and no criticism of Clinton doesn't show any dishonesty?

[ashearer]

This is why I don't get usually get involved in political discussions online. Someone who's committed to a position can always bring up new questions instead of responding to the original ones. (In this case I wasn't even taking a position, just pointing out where I found the logical reasoning unconvincing.) While both the new points you raise are open to debate, they shift the topic away from the two I was talking about. If I respond further we could be here forever.