[ryanwaggoner]

What? I have no idea how you made that jump. If you're angry at someone for making more than you (or more than the average income, what a useless metric), then yes, that's irrational. How could it not be?

If you're angry at someone for being unfair to you, then their wealth level is irrelevant.

If you're angry at them because they invested or spent their money in a way that way down the line has some tiny effect on your life that's negative [1], then that's too high a standard. There is literally no one on earth whose actions don't have some negative effect on someone, somewhere.

1. I mean that that individual's actions have a small effect on you, not that the aggregate effect isn't large and meaningful.