|
|
|
|
|
by mmanfrin
3503 days ago
|
|
This isn't about a house in the woods; this is about homes in a deeply urban environment which have surrounding services and businesses that are reliant on local residents; and public services supporting both the residents and businesses that are reliant on the active use and fees/taxes generated to sustain. Empty homes attract crime, necessitating more policing resources, empty homes do not support local businesses but drive up prices, making the area less affordable for residents and less lucrative for businesses. The 'payment' for living in an urban environment goes beyond just the normal local taxes, it involves a participation because the resident who lives in a home in that environment contributes to the environment. No house is an island in an urban environment (except maybe in Venice). |
|
Talk to someone living in San Jose or San Francisco about their daily commute on 85 or 101. They somehow don't profess as much love for densely populated urban environments.