[lisivka]

Your performance as programmer is poor, but as QA you are excellent.

[ambrop7]

You mean me personally? What makes you think so?

[lisivka]

Because you said that you can test program manually faster than write automated test case for it. I'm opposite. Human must think, computer must work.

[ambrop7]

I can write tests. I just prefer not to, for the sake of productivity and preserving sanity. If you disagree that I can write mostly bugless code, I challenge you to find some bugs in my open-source projects :)

https://github.com/ambrop72/aprinter

https://github.com/ambrop72/badvpn

[lisivka]

Your code will not pass my peer review. ;-)

[z92]

If it works, then it works. That's the point.

If I don't use it because it doesn't pass my peer review process, whatever that might be, then my competitor will use it and come up with a faster/cheaper solution than my one.

[lisivka]

Peer review is not for filtering software. Peer review is process which used by (professional) developers to help each other to catch bugs and share experience and best practices. Basically, I said him that I found bugs and/or bad practices in his code.