Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by redcalx 3511 days ago
Yeh. The paper claims to have controlled for this by comparing against kids in other groups, I suspect that might not be a very good control. E.g. if your daughter went on to join a different type of group that she did fit in with better, then that's a very clear selection bias. If I'm understanding correctly their control assumes kids just randomly select a group then stick with it.
1 comments

what about kids who don't do _any_ group
Consider this; if those kids that would normally avoid scouts/guide were now forced to go because their parents saw reports of this study, then the effects could very well be negative, in turn cancelling out or even reversing the reported overall beneficial effects.
It looks like they weren't included in the study because the authors deemed that they were subject to selection bias (correctly in my view).
1. Define mental health in terms of adherence to the mean. 2. Find a group where adherence to the mean is mandatory in order to continue in the group. 3. Success, the group makes you mentally healthy!