|
|
|
|
|
by amencarini
3505 days ago
|
|
This typeclasses discussion reminds me a lot of complaints about Go's lack of generics. Even without this "glaring shortcoming" Go became the de facto winner in the ops space, by staying a simple language with a smaller learning surface. Elm could be walking down the same route. Personally I find composability under The Elm Architecture more of an issue than pure language abstractions. |
|
Can you explain what you mean by this and possibly provide a source? I'd like to know how the different languages / platforms compare.