|
|
|
|
|
by greenshackle2
3504 days ago
|
|
He doesn't seem to understand NATO though. He made every security expert shit their pants by stating he wouldn't necessarily defend NATO countries. It makes me question his understanding of the strategic value of unconditional retaliation, which underpins MAD. (Alternatively, he understands, but doesn't care if Europe gets stomped by Russia.) |
|
He very clearly explained his thought process for this type of thing in the Art of the deal. To paraphrase, he started with an extreme position (disbanding NATO) so that he can meet the other party somewhere in the middle (they pay their fair share and do their part militarily).
Overall it would seem he was very successful with this.