|
|
|
|
|
by kleigenfreude
3510 days ago
|
|
The Media (and you it seems) almost immediately went into "where did we do wrong and what can we do better" mode. While that's a completely important thing to do, and appropriate for many problem situations, it isn't appropriate here. Here's why: 1. Clinton won the popular vote. 2. Economists think Trump is a bad idea, so on that level, the popular vote was not wrong. 3. The electoral college is outdated, was originally created because southern states wanted to keep slavery: http://time.com/4558510/electoral-college-history-slavery/ Unless the electoral college decides to vote with the American popular vote in this election, very bad things could happen: * California could try to hold a referendum for succession from the U.S., if they're not too stoned to do so: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-protest-trump-20... * Riots. Don't blame yourselves. The electoral college and Trump's campaign taking advantage of it (and the F.B.I.) are the reason that things are going to go bad. |
|
I can't get over how differently results seem to be reported in the US.
As of right now, reports I read suggest she's barely 100,000 votes ahead on that measure with "44 electoral votes still available".
i.e. there's a huge number of votes uncounted and that "fact" could easily turn out to be a poor prediction/
Why are news reports/speculation/predictions taken as fact without waiting for results to be announced?