|
|
|
|
|
by dredmorbius
3513 days ago
|
|
I was hoping someone might ask. 1. The snooping doesn't buy much ad placement benefit. That from Roberto Bayardo, Google advertising engineer. 2. The idea is not to cram ads down people's throughts all the time, but to not skeeve people off so much that you're not wwhere they go for purchase recommendations. If that means services which are mostly privacy-aware but that this means that you're where maps or shopping or search queries happen, that's a win. A counter might be that Google's primary aim now isn't ads but AI and training data. I still think that not annoying or alarming people is preferable. Some data are better than no data, or intentionally distorted data, or massive regulatory burden. Short answer: because privacy-promoting would be the better business choice. |
|
Are you saying Google should drop Maps, Gmail, Drive and all the rest because they are not valuable from a business perspective? Their business is ads after all (today at least).